Environmental Management and Compliance News, Tips and Tools

March 9, 2011

Finally! Air emissions standards for boilers and incinerators

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued final Clean Air Act standards for boilers and certain incinerators to reduce toxic air emissions, including mercury and soot. The rule establishes hazardous air pollutant emission standards for new and existing industrial, commercial and institutional boilers and process heaters located at major and area (minor) sources of toxic air pollutants, as well as commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators.  The final rule was signed on February 21.

EPA proposed these rules in April 2010, after a rulemaking period that began in 2007 when a federal court vacated a previous proposal for industry specific standards. Based on substantial public input that was received after the April 2010 proposal, EPA has made extensive revisions to the rules proposed at that time.

EPA estimates that the boiler rules will affect about 200,000 units located at large (major) and small (area) sources of hazardous air pollutant emissions across the country. The types of boilers covered by the new standards include:

  • Boilers and process heaters at major sources of hazardous or toxic air pollutants, such as refineries, chemical plants, and other industrial facilities, that burn natural gas, fuel oil, coal, biomass or other gases. EPA has further identified some 15 (!) subcategories of regulated boilers and process heaters at major sources.
  • Boilers located at area sources of toxic air emissions, including other industrial facilities, universities, hospitals, hotels and commercial buildings that burn fuel oil, coal or biomass. While these units constitute the far greater number of sources, they are responsible for a relatively small amount of the toxic air emissions addressed by the rule.

(more…)

Filed under: Air Pollution,Compliance,USEPA — TCozzie @ 5:22 pm

November 1, 2010

Just a little more time – for SPCC Plan updates

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has extended the deadline for most facilities that are required to prepare or revise their oil Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans to comply with recent amendments to the SPCC rule.  The compliance date of November 10, 2011, applies to regulated facilities in a broad range of categories, including:

Onshore oil production, farms, electric utility plants, petroleum refining and related industries, chemical manufacturing, food manufacturing, manufacturing facilities using and storing animal fats and vegetable oils, metal and other manufacturing, real estate rental and leasing, retail trade, petroleum bulk stations and terminals, education, hospitals and other health care, fuel oil dealers, gasoline stations, transportation and other commercial, etc.

However, some facilities are not eligible for the extension, and must comply by November 10, 2010.  These include:

Drilling, production or workover facilities that are offshore or that have an offshore component, and

Onshore facilities required to have and submit facility response plans (FRPs), due to the potential threat of significant oil spills to navigable waters or adjoining shorelines from these facilities.

As we must always note, owners or operators of facilities in operation before August 16, 2002, must continue to maintain and implement an SPCC Plan in accordance with the regulations then in effect.

More information on the rule can be found at the EPA webpage,  http://www.epa.gov/emergencies/content/spcc/compliance_dates.htm.

Filed under: Compliance,Rules and Regulations,Spill Prevention Plans,USEPA — TCozzie @ 8:58 am

August 2, 2010

EPA to delay compliance deadline for Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to extend the compliance date for some facilities subject to the Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule amendments.

(aboveground storage tank in secondary containment) Drilling, production or workover facilities that are offshore or onshore facilities required to have and submit facility response plans (FRPs) will not be eligible for the proposed extension, and must prepare or update their SPCC Plans in accordance with the rule amendments by November 10 of this year. Other facilities, including onshore oil production facilities, farms, utilities, various manufacturers, petroleum bulk storage and retail, transportation and commercial operations may put off their plan and facility updates until November 10, 2011.

Provided, of course, that facilities that were in operation and subject to SPCC regulations before August 16, 2002, maintain and continue to implement their existing SPCC Plans in accordance with the regulations that were then in effect.

More information on SPCC requirements can be found at this page. Please comment below or contact T. Cozzie Consulting if you have questions or concerns about how these requirements affect your facility.

Filed under: Compliance,Spill Prevention Plans,USEPA — TCozzie @ 6:18 pm

July 5, 2010

Announcing our latest upgrade of the Virtual Environmental (& Health & Safety) Manager Program

(Virtual Environmental Manager Welcome Screen)
(more…)

Filed under: Compliance,Solutions — TCozzie @ 5:12 pm

June 17, 2010

Reminder – TRI Reports due in two weeks!

If you have not completed your Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI) reports yet, note that they are due by July 1.

For additional information, refer to our TRI reporting guidance pages:

Of course, feel free to contact T. Cozzie Consulting (but soon!) if you need additional information or assistance.

Filed under: Compliance,Reporting,Toxics Release Inventory Form R — TCozzie @ 4:57 pm

May 13, 2010

Thresholds for greenhouse gas permitting announced

On May 13, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its final “GHG Tailoring” rule to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from stationary sources. The phased-in approach will initially address large facilities like power plants and oil refineries that emit most of the greenhouse gases from stationary sources. The regulated GHGs include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride.

(image of clouds)Starting in January 2011, Clean Air Act permitting requirements for GHGs will apply to large facilities that are already obtaining Clean Air Act permits for other pollutants. Those facilities will be required to include GHGs in their permit if they increase their GHG emissions by 75,000 tons per year (tpy). In July 2011, permitting requirements will expand to cover all new facilities with GHG emissions of at least 100,000 tpy and modifications at existing facilities that would increase GHG emissions by at least 75,000 tpy. The permits must demonstrate the use of best available control technologies to minimize GHG emission increases when facilities are constructed or significantly modified. EPA estimates approximately 900 additional permitting actions covering new sources and modifications to existing sources would be subject to review each year. In addition, 550 sources will need to obtain operating permits for the first time because of their GHG emissions.

Permitting requirements for smaller sources will await the findings of a 5-year study of the effects of GHG permitting of these sources, slated for completion in 2015.

According to the EPA press release announcing the final rule, the agency received about 450,000 (!) comments within the 60-day public comment period that followed issuance of the proposed rule in October 2009.

More information on the GHG Tailoring Rule and its implementation schedule can be found at http://www.epa.gov/nsr/actions.html.

What do you think? Has EPA struck the proper balance between regulating a significant threat to health and the environment and providing relief to small businesses and farms?

Filed under: Air Pollution,Compliance,Greenhouse Gases,Permits,USEPA — TCozzie @ 5:01 pm

Air pollutant emission standards for boilers and process heaters

On April 29, 2010, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed three rules to regulate hazardous air emissions from commercial, institutional and industrial boilers, process heaters and incinerators at major and area sources.

(emission control device and exhaust stack)One of the proposed rules addresses boilers at area sources – facilities that potentially emit less than 10 tons per year (tpy) of any single hazardous air pollutant or 25 tpy of combined air toxics. The rule will apply to facilities with boilers that burn coal, oil or biomass (i.e., wood), but not waste materials. New boilers that burn coal would need to meet emission standards for mercury, particulates and carbon monoxide. New boilers burning oil or biomass will need to meet emission limits for particulates and carbon monoxide. Existing large boilers (heat input of 10 million Btu/hr or greater) that burn coal will be required to meet emission limits for mercury and carbon monoxide; existing large boilers that are oil or biomass-fired will have an emission limit for carbon monoxide, only. The rule requires that all facilities with large boilers conduct an energy assessment to identify practicable conservation measures. Facilities with small boilers will be required only to conduct a boiler tune-up at least once every two years.

The second rule applies to boilers and process heaters at major source facilities. The rule will apply to boilers that burn natural gas, fuel oil, coal, biomass or other gas, but not waste, and to process heaters (which heat raw or intermediate materials in an industrial process).
(more…)

Filed under: Air Pollution,Compliance,Rules and Regulations,USEPA — TCozzie @ 5:00 pm

May 11, 2010

Compliance Alert: Deadline for Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Form R report is July 1

Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI) Form R or Form A reports are due by July 1! If your facility:

  • has 10 or more employees;
  • is included among certain covered industrial categories, including manufacturers that correspond to SIC Codes 20 through 39; some mining operations; utilities that burn coal or oil for commercial electrical generation; chemical wholesalers; petroleum bulk storage terminals; and waste treatment, disposal and recovery facilities; and
  • manufactured, imported, processed or otherwise used listed toxic chemicals above threshold reporting quantities,

(link to EPA reporting page)
Then you are likely required to report your releases and off-site transfers of the toxic chemicals.  More information on these requirements is linked at www.tcozzie.com/compliance/tri-2009.htm.  You can visit the Environmental Protection Agency’s TRI reporting materials page by clicking on the image at right.

Does your facility need to comply? Are you ready to meet this requirement? As always, feel free to contact T. Cozzie Consulting for further information or assistance.

April 20, 2010

EPA proposes expansion of mandatory greenhouse gases reporting requirements

In three four (!) separate notices published in the April 12 Federal Register, the US Environmental Protection Agency has proposed to expand the information required under the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule.  The additional information to be required includes…

  • reporting of emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases (GHGs) from certain sources, such as electronics manufacturing, production of fluorinated gases, and use of electrical transmission and distribution equipment, as well as manufacture or refurbishment of electrical equipment;
  • reporting on carbon dioxide (CO2) injection and geologic sequestration;
  • emissions reporting from the following industry segments:  petroleum and natural gas production, natural gas processing, natural gas transmission compressor stations, underground natural gas storage, liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage, LNG import and export terminals and distribution; and
  • for reporters subject to the rule to provide:  the name, address, and ownership status of their US parent company; their primary and all other applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes; and an indication of whether or not any of their reported emissions are from a cogeneration unit.

For more information on the proposed rules and how to comment, visit the EPA’s GHG reporting web page.

April 14, 2010

SPCC (Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure) Plan Template for qualified facilities is now available

The Environmental Protection Agency has published its template Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan for use by qualified Tier 1 facilities.  To use the template SPCC Plan, a facility can store no more than 10,000 gallons of oil in aboveground storage with no single storage container or tank larger than 5,000 gallons, and cannot have had within the past three years either one spill or release of more than 1,000 gallons or two spills that each exceeded 42 gallons within a 12-month period.
PDF download
You can download a fill-in PDF version of the SPCC Plan template by clicking (or right click to save) the PDF icon to the right.

Other versions of the SPCC Plan template (MS Word and Wordperfect) can be found on the EPA website.

Remember, the deadline to amend or prepare and implement an SPCC Plan meeting the latest requirements is November 10, 2010.  Visit our spill prevention page for additional information and guidance on compliance with SPCC Plan requirements. Or contact T. Cozzie Consulting if you have further questions about how the SPCC rule applies to your facility, or desire assistance with your SPCC Plan.

Filed under: Compliance,Spill Prevention Plans,USEPA — TCozzie @ 6:34 pm
« Newer PostsOlder Posts »